From Immigration affecting congressional seats, study finds
By Jim Abrams, Associated Press Writer, The Associated Press, October 6, 1998:

The concentration of immigrants, who usually vote Democratic, will lead to more safe Democratic seats, said James Gimpel, a University of Maryland associate professor who is an expert on immigration issues .... "You are likely to see more partisan polarization on the immigration issue," he said.

Two comments from two unknown individuals, “Loge” and “Heidenlord” from Skadi Forum the largest Germanic online community forum:

Loge:

“seems that the uneducated immigrants usually vote towards the liberal party, wonder why that is?”

Heidenlord:

It has to do with a number of factors I believe. The first being socialist democracy. Democracy has been called "two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner" and I think it sums it up nicely.

A "hand-out" system will eventually corrupt even the best work ethic of the most respectable germanics, but for minorities it is a free-for-all. The poor will always outnumber the rich and when the poor are given the same amount of voting power as the rich it is only a matter of time until they vote themselves the national treasury. The framers of the American Constitution understood this and only allowed land-owning males the right to vote because they understood that only those who have a vested interest in the affairs of the government should have a say in government.

The greatest fallacy in the world is to give someone who can't make money, buy land, or lead a normal life a say in government. What makes people believe that individuals who are failures are going to make a wise choice altogether, I will never know. Governments don't run on good intentions but are governed by the same laws of nature that guide everything else here on earth; governments cannot take blood from a stone nor can they create wealth, they really only consume wealth.

When governments start taking orders from those who can't even balance their own checkbook, we know the end is near. All Democracies have ended in a dictatorship because one day the "free lunch" is over and someone has to stand up and say this and be prepared to "bash some heads" when the hangovers start from the democracy/socialism induced free-for-all.

(…)

Democratic socialist Hugo Chavez has shut down (conservative) opposition news stations in Venezuela. Democratic socialists here in America want to shut down (conservative) opposition news in the form of talk radio through HR 3302 or “The Fairness Doctrine”.

Several months back I wrote an essay about a chain email. The gist of the email was that democracies throughout history have always been temporary in nature. The email’s author insists that, “A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.” Some of the following are excerpts from that essay which I never published. It is all now more relevant than before.

The email presented the following list:

…nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From Bondage to spiritual faith

From spiritual faith to great courage
From courage to liberty
From liberty to abundance
From abundance to complacency
From complacency to apathy
From apathy to dependence
From dependence back into bondage

I am aware of snopes.com and truthorfiction.com questioning the emails authenticity. Some versions of the email say its author is a man named Tyler, but it is most often attributed to Sir Alex Fraser Tyler. However, whether it was written by Sir Alex Fraser Tyler or Fred Flintstone, no amount of questioning can argue with the wisdom of it.

There is no such thing as an accident. If an “accident” is presented with sufficient background, it can always be shown, in the chain of events that somebody somewhere made a mistake that directly contributed to the “accident”. Somewhere a mistake was made, whether it is operator error in a vehicle crash or poor quality management when inspecting the construction of the brake system installed on that vehicle that failed. Someone somewhere is responsible for that accident.

Governments never do anything spontaneously. They will begin planning decades ahead of time. The implementation of a radical government (tyranny) is figuratively a chess game. Whether the implementation is intentional or not is of no consequence.

At one time only white male property owners could vote in America. With the exception of the racist and sexist “white male” portion of it, this law had the potential to prevent socialism. Doing away with it in its entirety may very well have been the very first step towards America’s demise.

Property owners care about what they have. The have not’s don’t care about another persons property. They just want a piece of the pie by whatever means necessary. If they can legally vote themselves a portion of someone else’s hard earned property, they will do so. And they are.

With the influx of uneducated masses with voting rights into America, more votes will go towards those candidates who promise the “generous gifts from the public treasury”. Their promises of course can not be kept but, the candidates will eventually acquire the power they seek nonetheless.

The recent immigration bill is a win-win situation for government elites.

1. Immigrants will vote for socialist politicians, this fact is indisputable. They will vote for those politicians who promise them “generous gifts from the public treasury”.

2. This bill most certainly enables terrorists. If and when another catastrophic terrorist attack occurs, the government will implement marshal law.

According to an interview with Newsmax, FBI Director Robert Mueller al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.

While I am a proponent of marshal law and I understand the necessity of it in certain situations I am also aware of the fact that after a government clamps down on its populace, historically that populace never quite recovers 100% of the freedoms which it had previous to that clamp down. If the circumstances in this nation were different I would not be concerned but they aren’t and I am.

Why have conservative political leaders done nothing to stop the communist ACLU and NLG from destroying the Christian values of our nation? The same Christian values that Marxists have declared stands predominantly in the way of the implementation of socialism. There are so many “whys” that I could fill this whole page with them… where are we as a nation?

For all of this we have liberalism to blame and “conservative” leaders who have done nothing to halt it.

Z visas and independent analysis of this bill until ones nose bleeds does not change any of the above.

The good Lord Almighty above knows that the majority of us want to help everyone else out but, there is a reason most of out fathers raised us telling us that, “life’s not fair and that’s why you have to fight for what you want”. In fighting our parents of course meant seeking education and striving to do the best you can in everything you do. However, not everyone was raised with these values. All leftist liberals were either never taught this value or rebelled against it and have continued to whine, “It’s not fair!”…

Do not insult us. It’s not about diversity, it’s about the votes.