About Me

Name: gregmc
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

CAIR courts neo-Nazi’s, the liberal Left typically courts both CAIR and the radical Islamists due to moral relativism…

CAIR courts neo-Nazi’s, the liberal Left typically courts both CAIR and the radical Islamists due to moral relativism…


At a CAIR co-sponsored event in 1998 at Brooklyn College in New York, speaker Wagdy Ghuniem roused the crowd with a stirring ditty that contained the lyrics: “No to the Jews, descendants of the apes.” (Transcript provided by the Investigative Project.)

http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=1019FD98-A14E-48ED-B9F8-D9FAECFCE635


CAIR Promotes and Hosts William W. Baker, Neo-Nazi

http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/195


Now head of Christians and Muslims for Peace (CAMP), Baker was chairman of the neo-Nazi Populist Party in 1984 and organized its national convention that year. The Populist Party was established and directed by Willis Carto, head of the now-defunct Liberty Lobby.

http://www.ocweekly.com/features/features/hour-of-white-power/22089/


Yet, the Liberal Left accuses the moderate-conservative Christian Right of being Nazi’s/Fascists etc… but, it is the moderate-conservative Christian Right who believes in fighting the radical Islamists... how does that calculate?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Left Proudly Resolute in Ignorance

When the next Islamic terrorist plot to disrupt our economy and inflict massive civilian casualties manages to slip through the nets of the DHS or the FBI, I have entertained the fantasy that maybe some of our Leftist liberal “friends” here in America will finally wake up to the realization of that which we face.

I am normally an optimist but I am afraid that the stiff-necked people of the Left will stand proudly resolute in their ignorance and denial. Some may have that light bulb pop on but most will probably blame it on President Bush and America and Christians and…

Still others will see it as an opportunity to loot and take shots at the police, like they did in New Orleans.

Check out Mapping Sharia, I think it may be one of the most important sites on the web right now.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why the Left Hates Talk Radio & Conservative Blogs

For the past 30 or so years the communist/socialist Left (liberals, progressives etc.) has been steadily and happily working away at destroying this nation and reshaping it with no or little consequence or public recognition of their activities.

They have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar by the silent majority which has found its voice.

They see all of their “hard work” accomplished worshipping at the alter of Marx, Stalin, Castro, Che Guevara, Chavez etc. being washed clean in the basin of truth.

They are watching and listening as the people of this nation are having their eyes opened to the murderous history of the policies the international America hating Left is pushing on America.

There is no “new” Christian Conservative Right here in America. We have always been here. We are just fed up with the socialist/communist Left and are doing something about it.

The Left is scared and they should be.

America is the better way. Our constitution was written to PREVENT freedom raping ideologies like socialism.

Keep blogging, keep speaking and keep learning my friends.

American freedom will never die.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

At least 70% of Palestinians prefer Israeli “occupation”

From Abbas sees Palestinians on brink of civil war By Isabel Kershner Published: June 6, 2007

… a few Palestinian columnists have broken a political taboo by referring to the Israeli occupation as perhaps preferable to the current chaos. Majed Azzam wrote in the Hamas-affiliated Al Risala weekly that Palestinians "should have the courage to acknowledge the truth," that the only thing that "prevents the chaos and turmoil in Gaza from spreading to the West Bank is the presence of the Israeli occupation."

Another Palestinian writer, Bassem al-Nabris, a poet from Khan Yunis in the Gaza Strip, wrote in the Arabic electronic newspaper Elaph that if there were a referendum in the Gaza Strip on the question of whether people would like the Israeli occupation to return, "half the population would vote 'yes.' But in practice," he continued, "I believe that the number of those in favor is at least 70 percent, if not more."

"If the occupation returns," Nabris added, "at least there will be no civil war, and the occupier will have a moral and legal obligation to provide the occupied people with employment and food, which they now lack."

Read it all…Abbas sees Palestinians on brink of civil war

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Unpleasant Game of Chess

From Immigration affecting congressional seats, study finds
By Jim Abrams, Associated Press Writer, The Associated Press, October 6, 1998:

The concentration of immigrants, who usually vote Democratic, will lead to more safe Democratic seats, said James Gimpel, a University of Maryland associate professor who is an expert on immigration issues .... "You are likely to see more partisan polarization on the immigration issue," he said.

Two comments from two unknown individuals, “Loge” and “Heidenlord” from Skadi Forum the largest Germanic online community forum:

Loge:

“seems that the uneducated immigrants usually vote towards the liberal party, wonder why that is?”

Heidenlord:

It has to do with a number of factors I believe. The first being socialist democracy. Democracy has been called "two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner" and I think it sums it up nicely.

A "hand-out" system will eventually corrupt even the best work ethic of the most respectable germanics, but for minorities it is a free-for-all. The poor will always outnumber the rich and when the poor are given the same amount of voting power as the rich it is only a matter of time until they vote themselves the national treasury. The framers of the American Constitution understood this and only allowed land-owning males the right to vote because they understood that only those who have a vested interest in the affairs of the government should have a say in government.

The greatest fallacy in the world is to give someone who can't make money, buy land, or lead a normal life a say in government. What makes people believe that individuals who are failures are going to make a wise choice altogether, I will never know. Governments don't run on good intentions but are governed by the same laws of nature that guide everything else here on earth; governments cannot take blood from a stone nor can they create wealth, they really only consume wealth.

When governments start taking orders from those who can't even balance their own checkbook, we know the end is near. All Democracies have ended in a dictatorship because one day the "free lunch" is over and someone has to stand up and say this and be prepared to "bash some heads" when the hangovers start from the democracy/socialism induced free-for-all.

(…)

Democratic socialist Hugo Chavez has shut down (conservative) opposition news stations in Venezuela. Democratic socialists here in America want to shut down (conservative) opposition news in the form of talk radio through HR 3302 or “The Fairness Doctrine”.

Several months back I wrote an essay about a chain email. The gist of the email was that democracies throughout history have always been temporary in nature. The email’s author insists that, “A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.” Some of the following are excerpts from that essay which I never published. It is all now more relevant than before.

The email presented the following list:

…nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From Bondage to spiritual faith

From spiritual faith to great courage
From courage to liberty
From liberty to abundance
From abundance to complacency
From complacency to apathy
From apathy to dependence
From dependence back into bondage

I am aware of snopes.com and truthorfiction.com questioning the emails authenticity. Some versions of the email say its author is a man named Tyler, but it is most often attributed to Sir Alex Fraser Tyler. However, whether it was written by Sir Alex Fraser Tyler or Fred Flintstone, no amount of questioning can argue with the wisdom of it.

There is no such thing as an accident. If an “accident” is presented with sufficient background, it can always be shown, in the chain of events that somebody somewhere made a mistake that directly contributed to the “accident”. Somewhere a mistake was made, whether it is operator error in a vehicle crash or poor quality management when inspecting the construction of the brake system installed on that vehicle that failed. Someone somewhere is responsible for that accident.

Governments never do anything spontaneously. They will begin planning decades ahead of time. The implementation of a radical government (tyranny) is figuratively a chess game. Whether the implementation is intentional or not is of no consequence.

At one time only white male property owners could vote in America. With the exception of the racist and sexist “white male” portion of it, this law had the potential to prevent socialism. Doing away with it in its entirety may very well have been the very first step towards America’s demise.

Property owners care about what they have. The have not’s don’t care about another persons property. They just want a piece of the pie by whatever means necessary. If they can legally vote themselves a portion of someone else’s hard earned property, they will do so. And they are.

With the influx of uneducated masses with voting rights into America, more votes will go towards those candidates who promise the “generous gifts from the public treasury”. Their promises of course can not be kept but, the candidates will eventually acquire the power they seek nonetheless.

The recent immigration bill is a win-win situation for government elites.

1. Immigrants will vote for socialist politicians, this fact is indisputable. They will vote for those politicians who promise them “generous gifts from the public treasury”.

2. This bill most certainly enables terrorists. If and when another catastrophic terrorist attack occurs, the government will implement marshal law.

According to an interview with Newsmax, FBI Director Robert Mueller al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.

While I am a proponent of marshal law and I understand the necessity of it in certain situations I am also aware of the fact that after a government clamps down on its populace, historically that populace never quite recovers 100% of the freedoms which it had previous to that clamp down. If the circumstances in this nation were different I would not be concerned but they aren’t and I am.

Why have conservative political leaders done nothing to stop the communist ACLU and NLG from destroying the Christian values of our nation? The same Christian values that Marxists have declared stands predominantly in the way of the implementation of socialism. There are so many “whys” that I could fill this whole page with them… where are we as a nation?

For all of this we have liberalism to blame and “conservative” leaders who have done nothing to halt it.

Z visas and independent analysis of this bill until ones nose bleeds does not change any of the above.

The good Lord Almighty above knows that the majority of us want to help everyone else out but, there is a reason most of out fathers raised us telling us that, “life’s not fair and that’s why you have to fight for what you want”. In fighting our parents of course meant seeking education and striving to do the best you can in everything you do. However, not everyone was raised with these values. All leftist liberals were either never taught this value or rebelled against it and have continued to whine, “It’s not fair!”…

Do not insult us. It’s not about diversity, it’s about the votes.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leftist liberal? Need help?

 

Leftist liberal? Need help? Read: PARANOIA STRIKES DEEP

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So Absolutely Certain


Have you ever been so absolutely certain of something that you would bet your last pound of crab legs only to be shown evidence which proves you wrong? Of course, we all have.

Just two days ago I was disagreeing with my lady concerning some dates and a time frame for a notice we needed to submit. My first mistake was arguing numbers with an accountant. My second mistake was my logic was reversed and I had to blush and admit fault. I am capable of admitting fault by the grace of God but it is still a hit to my pride because I take pride in being right the majority of the time. It’s part of my makeup, it matters to me. That’s why I am a professional and a leader.

Without any formal education in philosophy, through blogging alone I am learning that there are certain beliefs which to one ideological mindset may seem elementary and indisputable. However, to another they are quite the opposite.

Considering I am 35 years old and only now over the past 3 years or so cognitively recognizing and acknowledging the disparities in our society I may be a little behind the curve but, I am learning nonetheless. Help your friends and family do the same, we all need to understand.

Greek historian Herodotus (c. 484 – 420 BC) observed that each society regards its own belief system and way of doing things as the best, in contrast to that of others.

What then is the purpose of all we do? What is the purpose of all we write?

“Give us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand for - because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything.” ~ Peter Marshall US Senate Chaplain 1947

The purpose is to establish that which we believe to be most just and to fight for it by any means necessary.

There have been periods in history when the fights which are rising to a head here in America have occurred before. In the fight between the Left and the Right, history is repeating itself right here before our eyes no matter their labels in the past.

This weekend while in the restroom at Borders I noted some writing scrawled across the wall. It was a rough political discourse between several unknown individuals. The basic gist of it was that Civil War II may be coming soon to this nation.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberalism, Journalism & Artists

I once read some time ago that generally individuals of the “artistic” persuasion (actors, poets, musicians, authors, composers etc.) have a notably higher chance of suffering from some type of mental illness or may at the very least have a higher chance of being eccentric.

The heightened capacity for abstract thought I presume is the reason for this. I fully acknowledge that this is not something to be condemned but, I postulate that it may have something to do with the fact that “artistic” individuals are more frequently drawn to journalism since journalism is in its most basic conception a form of art.

Since these types of individuals or personalities are more prone to be the sort who pursue journalism could we assume that they posses the same sort of abstract thinking that causes the illogical disconnect we so frequently see from the liberal main stream media?

Is anyone aware of any studies on this? What are your thoughts?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Useful Idiots

“Air America Radio was designed and built to advance the Democratic Party, not necessarily liberalism.”

(…)

Air America was formed in 2004 for the distinct purpose of defeating George Bush. It was funded by Sheldon Drobny.

“Drobny became controversial after National Review’s Byron York reported on his writings for the small website MakeThemAccountable.com. Drobny’s rantings likened President Bush to Adolf Hitler and accused the Bush family of links to Nazi Germany. These … notions, Drobny acknowledged, came from his readings of conspiracy theories published by former Trotskyite Lyndon LaRouche’s organization.”

Air America was designed specifically to put forth the Leftist agenda on the radio where conservatives have dominated. Air America was a radio station designed to monopolize the radio waves with a Leftist agenda.

Air America is now bankrupt.

“Thanks to TV and for the convenience of TV, you can only be one of two kinds of human beings, either a liberal or a conservative.” ~ Kurt Vonnegut

Moving forward…

All liberals have an inherent misplaced desire to make the government help the less fortunate by forcing hard working people to do so through taxation, a blind belief in unrestricted “tolerance” and the misguided desire to have big government interference in our lives.

Most accurately, liberals and progressives are likely to be tools or “Useful Idiots” of the Leftists.

Lenin made reference to certain people he called “Useful Idiots”. Today’s liberals and progressives are the “Useful Idiots” of American society. Either knowingly or unknowingly they are furthering the goals of the socialist/communist elites of today’s Democratic Party. The fact that 100% of the Democratic Party’s support comes from those various people and organizations who lean left is irrefutable to anyone on the Left or the Right who are even remotely aware of today’s current events.

Not only are they “Useful Idiots” for the socialist/communist elites of today’s Democratic Party. They are also “Useful Idiots” for Islamism.

"Islamic organizations are carefully orchestrating lawsuits, marches, large propaganda campaigns all across the nation. Islamic schools and mosques are being built in record numbers across the nation with Saudi oil money...Islam is on the march. The submission of the great country of the United States to Islam has begun just as planned. Just as we were warned by Osama bin Laden, Islam is using Americas own laws and freedoms to destroy us." So says Randy Taylor in this riveting must-read.

Democratic socialist elites have walked hand in hand with Islamists before. In Germany during WWI Democratic socialist elites made alliances with Islam to kill Christians in Turkey and fight the US. German democratic socialist elites made alliances with Islam to kill Jews in WWII and fight the US.

Through bill HR 3302 or the Fairness doctrine: Liberal Democrats are attempting to muzzle conservative talk radio: they are assaulting free speech. Like the communists in the former Soviet Union, America’s liberals seek to crush dissent by consolidating control over the media—especially talk radio, which has emerged as the dominant medium for conservative opinion. … The real force behind the effort to censor conservative talk radio is the progressive–philanthropist, George Soros.

Most Leftwing (progressive/liberal) blogs and “news” propaganda websites online will lock out a user who posts an alternate and dissident voice. They do so for a myriad of weak excuses ranging from “republican talking points” to “veering off subject”. Even considering the fact that those people own those sites and can do what they please and regardless of the reasons it is an expose’ of the Lefts desire to stomp out dissidence. It is proof of the totalitarian tendencies found in individuals of the Leftist persuasion.

According to discoverthenetworks.org AlterNet.com, a leftwing “news site” identifies three major “challenges” toward which it directs its efforts on a daily basis:

The right-wing media machine: “The scope of conservative media is vast. … The ability of the right-wing media apparatus to dominate public discourse is at the expense of liberal and progressive values and represents a fundamental transformation in American politics. This is what we are fighting against.”

The negative impact of right-wing media: “Over the past two decades conservative media has had a huge impact, and the results are disconcerting. First, most conservative media uses an ideological propaganda model that results in a more ignorant audience.”

Building the progressive “echo chamber”: “The top-down delivery model of right-wing rhetoric … traces a path directly from the White House and conservative think tanks, to Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and a whole host of conservative talk shows. These messages are repeated and further reinforced on the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal and other newspapers, creating a right wing echo chamber. AlterNet is working hard with many partners to build the progressive echo chamber that will fight back.”

From whence shall the Left wing propaganda come? From the poor, uneducated and disenfranchised the Leftist elites claim to represent? No, the propaganda comes from Leftist elites.

If you don’t like it don’t listen or don’t read it (although I personally suggest you do anyways). If you want to get your opinion out then get your own show or station or blog or news site.

Those on the Left view their failure to be successful in the dissemination of their message not as a failure of the ideology itself but rather, as a failure to properly oppress the opposing view.

You won’t find many conservatives who subscribe to oppression as a resolution. The bill HR 3302 mentioned above was written by a Democrat, is overwhelmingly supported by Democrats and their “Useful Idiots” in society. The desire to oppress other people’s voices is the only sure formula for success because when you take a look at reality, history and human nature their ideas don’t make much sense. They are not progressive, their “new” ideas are nothing more than recycled Marxism. When confronted with truth, their great “progressive” ideas wither yet onward they plod.

There is a trend in leftist thinking that should be noted here. Because the proponents of Leftist ideology have not proven capable of breaking into the world of media, instead of questioning the ideology they are attempting to promote they choose instead to blame the more successful conservative radio “monopoly”. This is due to the same mental disconnect that prevents most liberals from analyzing and assigning blame where it should be assigned. “It’s not fair” is the battle cry of the Left. To be a leftist and pander to a certain “marginalized” audience one must merely assign blame to someone else. White capitalists work best to receive that blame.

Conservative radio has proven to be much more successful not because it is supported solely rich corporation with capitalist agendas but because it is intelligent, it makes sense and above all else it promotes freedom.

Here in America we have the two predominant divided personalities of the world and their opposing priorities and issues rising to a head. This has always historically caused bloodshed. Can these two types of people coexist in peace? The answer is yes, but only for a limited amount of time or only through strict adherence to a constitution which prevents the political pendulum from swinging too far to the right or left of center.

You will frequently hear Democrats refer to our constitution as a “living breathing” document. In other words, they see our constitution as a malleable document. We also observe liberal judges re-interpreting our constitution to further the goals of the socialist/communist left. Furthermore, organizations such as the ACLU and the National Lawyers Guild or NLG which were both formed by communists and are furthering the leftist agenda in America’s courts.

[The ACLU was] Established in 1920 by Roger Baldwin (who candidly stated that "Communism [was] the goal" toward which his efforts were directed)…

The NLG was founded in 1937 by Communist Party USA attorneys and liberal fellow-travelers as a pro-New Deal, progressive alternative to the segregated and comparatively conservative American Bar Association (ABA). ~ This has never been nor will it ever be a communist country.

On the Right we have a realistic understanding of the importance of national security and the recognition of personal responsibility as being the most important ingredient to an individual’s success.

On the Left we have a desire to lay blame on humans and corporations (major enemies of the Left unless it happens to be a leftist corporation) for global warming even though climate change’s cause is being reliably and scientifically questioned (this is similar to the same panics the Left instigated in the past such as imminent and utter destruction of the Earth by the 1980’s because of overpopulation, holes in the ozone, el Niño etc.). They wish to oppress freedom of speech, fight for the rights for child molesters, social justice, blame whitey, the utter loss of American cultural identity, gun control (so we are defenseless), more concern for animals than humans and the desire to use tax dollars to give the “less fortunate” the freedom to kill their babies (so Planned Parenthood and the manufacturers of baby brain vacuums can profit)…

America is not a socialist/communist or a Leftist nation. There are millions of us who never want it to be. The secular far Left’s push for its agenda is causing the far Right to rear its ugly, aggressive and indomitable head. They have thoroughly divided this nation. The far Right is awakening and with their awakening will come a reckoning for the socialist Left. A reckoning our nation has not seen on its soil since the early 1860’s.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

All eyes on Kosovo

Very important read… The inconvenient Serbs - by Spengler over at Asia Times Online

Serbia
and Russia draw a line in the sand over the independence of Kosovo, we may observe the second occasion in history when a Muslim advance on Europe halted on Serbian soil. The first occurred in 1456, three years after the fall of Constantinople, when Sultan Mehmed II was thrown back from the walls of Belgrade, "The White City", by Hungarian and Serb defenders. The Siege of Belgrade "decided the fate of Christendom", wrote the then Pope Calixtus III. Not for nothing did J R R Tolkien name his fictional stronghold of Minas Tirith "The White City".

While America's attention is riveted on Iraq, Russia is outraged at the American-backed plan for Kosovo's independence, proposed by UN special envoy Martti Ahtisaari. Kosovo comprised the historic Serbian heartland, Christian Serbs comprise less than a tenth of the present population. Perhaps 200,000 Serbs have left the province since the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) made Kosovo a protectorate in 2000.

The inconvenient Serbs

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jihadists may be targeting US schools

FBI and DHS have been handing out bulletins to law enforcement across the country warning that jihadists may be targeting US schools….

This is a bit of very important information that has not been disseminated adequately. I invite you all to help me spread this.

April 12, 2007
From Crisis of the Republic

(Note to Jihad Watchers: I wrote this a few weeks ago and thought I would reproduce it here for comments.)

by Gregory M. Davis

We learn today that the FBI and DHS have been handing out bulletins to law enforcement across the country warning that jihadists may be targeting US schools. Terrorism analyst Lt Col Steve Grossman recently warned that the US is vulnerable to a Beslan-style attack. Beslan, you will recall, is the southern Russian city where in 2004 Muslim jihadists took over a school and killed 332 people, 178 of them children. “The enemy is infiltrating us at all levels, and certainly school bus drivers are one area to look at,” Col Grossman warns. “And how about high school, middle school and elementary school cafeteria workers? Janitors? Delivery people?” Not a comforting thought.

Vice-president Dick Cheney, echoing the sentiments of many of our public officials, sometime ago pronounced that, “Another attack is a matter not of if, but when.” This coming from the second elected representative of the executive branch, whose very reason for existence is to protect us from such attacks. This is a little like your doctor telling you that malpractice is a not a matter of if, but when.

Should something like Beslan occur in this country with hundreds of American schoolchildren dead, those in government will be guilty of nothing short of criminal negligence.

A terrorist conspiracy on the order of Beslan or 9/11 only becomes inevitable when the powers that be willfully choose not to take the necessary steps for its prevention. Those necessary steps today would entail common-sense ideological profiling: pay special attention to those adherents of ideologies bent on our destruction. The most powerful such ideology in the world today is Islam. Thus, putting two and two together, place restrictions on Muslims that would forestall the development of a major terrorist conspiracy.

But instead of taking the necessary, modest, and overt measures that would protect the US from Muslim terrorism, Washington has chosen to aggrandize its power at home and abroad while leaving us open to attack. It is almost unbelievable to reflect on the fact that, five and a half years after the most spectacular terrorist attack in world history, US borders and ports remain effectively unguarded. We should bear in mind that 9/11 would never have come off had we simply enforced the laws that were already on the books – several of the hijackers would have been picked up on visa violations. Perhaps instead of spending half a trillion dollars trying to bring “democracy” to Muslim Mesopotamia, we could spend a tenth or a hundredth of that keeping jihadists off US soil.

The vague, ill-named “war on terror” amounts to a titanic power grab by the national security establishment in the service of its own – rather than the nation’s – interests. After another attack, can we expect an even more sweeping “war on evil?” But we are not at war with some shadowy “terror” lurking in every closet, we are war with Islamic jihad. The natural course is to name the enemy, fight jihad, and prevent the seeds of jihad – namely, Islam – from taking root in this country. But such an approach would deprive the national security establishment of the justification for its worldwide cloak-and-dagger game as well as the military expansionism we have been practicing since the collapse of the Soviet Union – to the tune now of 700 overseas US military bases.

The Founding Fathers warned against precisely the sort of thing that has transpired since 9/11: handing over the keys of the kingdom to a national security apparatus that operates outside effective constitutional controls. We should not be surprised that the Pentagon, CIA, NSA, FBI, etc., etc. are hungry for greater powers, but we should be outraged that our elected representatives have so cravenly give it to them. Handing our welfare over to largely secret and gigantically complex institutions while trusting them to act in our best interests is naïve at best and, for a free society, potentially suicidal. Instead of aggrandizing the national security establishment that so failed us on 9/11, we should have culled the herd. Who in our defense and intelligence agencies was fired for failing to stop 9/11? Not the heads of the CIA, NSA, FBI, or DOD. Was anyone?

Washington today is seriously off the rails. That in and of itself is not too surprising. But instead of mishandling the environment, transportation, or health care, Washington is now recasting the very foundations of our civil society and leaving us exposed to the jihadist enemy. It is a crisis of the republic.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Consequences of Censorship


Take a jaunt over to Markos Moulitsas Zuniga’s www.dailykos.com.

They don’t allow conservative voices over at dailykos.

A while back I attempted to open dialog with the self proclaimed kossaks by starting a conservative blog in their midst. On both occasions, on my very first post, as soon as I was tagged a “troll” and attacked by the rabid hyenas at dailykos my blog was locked out.

I still pop in there every once in a while to see what’s going on.

I encourage you to read a few columns there. Read the comments for as long as you can stand it. Compare what you see there with what you see on any conservative blog. You will see only leftist, liberal or progressive voices in a sea of sick humor and strange blog author names, strange signature lines and even stranger comments.

You will see a consequence of censorship. A morass of like minded warped personalities far removed from the reality of the general American opinion. They exist in world in which only they are right and everyone else is to be ridiculed with sarcastic humor or viciously and hatefully attacked.

They are so sure in the legitimacy of their views that they slap each other on the backs when one spews a particularly witty quip with no other voices of contention to dispute their far left viewpoints.

It’s really not that funny. The insanity is a bit disturbing. They are at least 100,000 strong.

Go check them out for yourself.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Compromising Ones Morals

  

The tolerate everything crowd insists that everyone else “tolerate” as they do. If you don’t you are a racist, or a homophobe or an Islamophobe or what ever kind of “ist” or “phobe” they come up with to discredit and thereby suppress another persons views.  A good example is the enabling of our nation’s illegal immigrants and the resistance to correcting our porous border situation.

They don’t tolerate because they have superior morals but because they themselves have compromised their own morals to such a point that they have snowballed. Not only that but, it would be hypocritical for them to do otherwise. Their self righteousness is seriously misplaced, so much so as to cause a sober thinking individual to question their mental stability.

Some people insist that marijuana is a gateway drug. Many don’t really understand why. By engaging in an illegal activity like smoking weed, you are compromising a moral. Regardless of what the smoker may think or the excuses they conjure, it’s illegal therefore you are compromising a moral. It is immoral to break the law regardless of how you feel about that law.

Once you start compromising your morals it can quickly turn into a snowball effect.

Each additional moral you compromise will fall away with so much ease.

Nobody realizes this until the cycle stops, their head stops spinning and they break free. Many people have to be in the bottom of the barrel before they stop compromising morals and start building honor and pride again. Many people are destroying themselves and assisting in the destruction of our nation.

I compromised some of my morals when I left the service and I started to spiral down but I am one of those lucky people who found God. God and the subsequent honor and courage that comes by walking with Him. I could claim that my cognitive reasoning and inner strength is what saved me but I choose to give that glory to God.

Does everyone who compromises a moral or two spiral downward? Of course not. However, I propose that every person who subscribes to Leftist ideology has compromised so many common morals that they know of nothing else now. Birds of a feather flock together, they can’t break free.

Apart from the Gramsci/Trotsky socialist intentions of the elite, I observe that the reason many people on the Left, the masses in particular tolerate EVERYTHING except that which is itself the bastion of morality is due to the fact that so many of them have compromised their souls into a dark pit of immorality.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act

Thanks to Jaxhawk for the heads up on this.

This little tidbit of Leninist thought control is brought to us courtesy of Rep. John Conyers of Michigan.

According to Discover the Networks John Conyers:

  • -Member of the radical Progressive Caucus
  • -One of 13 founders of Congressional Black Caucus
  • -Advocates freeing convicted cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal
  • -Spoke in 2003 at anti-Iraq War rally of pro-North Korean Marxist group International A.N.S.W.E.R.
  • -Voted against a resolution stating that "the United States and Israel are now engaged in a common struggle against terrorism."
  • -His district has a higher proportion of Muslims than any other in Congress, and his official congressional web site can be read in Arabic
  • -Spoke in 2005 at an event organized by accused anti-Semite Lyndon LaRouche
  • -Orchestrated letter-writing and media campaign over so-called Downing Street Memo with help from George Soros-funded MoveOn.org

For those of you who don’t know the Congressional Black Caucus vows to remain racially segregated. That is, they won’t allow any white folk or other races to join their special little group. They “address racism, disenfranchisement, and other “legislative concerns of black and minority citizens

Disenfranchisement

Conyers has been a National Executive Board member of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), which was created as a Soviet front and still embraces its Communist heritage. In a June 1, 1979 New York Times opinion piece he co-authored with Marcus Raskin, co-founder of the extreme leftwing think tank the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), Conyers asserted that "government's responsibility is to revitalize the nation's economy through creative forms of public ownership" - in other words, through socialism.

The socialists over at the Human Rights Campaign website claim that “A hate crime occurs when the perpetrator of the crime intentionally selects the victim because of who the victim is.”

So if a mugger chooses a rich white man to rob are these racists going to charge that mugger of a hate crime? This convoluted fascist law is intended to do nothing more than bring state oppression to anyone who disagrees with them. It’s just another step in the New Lefts long march through the culture.

HR 1592

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Boy Dies - Bacteria From Tooth Spread to Brain

… and hard facts those on the Left don’t like to face.

HealthFam’s is a state run welfare dental insurance plan. Its members consist almost exclusively of generational welfare families.

When the parents of these members call, they typically cannot speak English and if they do speak English, it is either with trailer park trash verbosity (or lack thereof) or mush mouthed Ebonics.

Our Spanish speaking representatives (all of which are Mexican) often tell me that the Spanish speaking callers frequently don’t know how to spell their children’s names or they don’t know their own children’s birthday(s). This is an example of welfare money grubbing baby factories. There is no other explanation. Not when it’s on this size and scope.

For Want of a Dentist

Pr. George's Boy Dies After Bacteria From Tooth Spread to Brain

By Mary Otto

Washington Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, February 28, 2007; Page B01

Twelve-year-old Deamonte Driver died of a toothache Sunday.

A routine, $80 tooth extraction might have saved him.

If his mother had been insured.

If his family had not lost its Medicaid.

If Medicaid dentists weren't so hard to find.

If his mother hadn't been focused on getting a dentist for his brother, who had six rotted teeth.

By the time Deamonte's own aching tooth got any attention, the bacteria from the abscess had spread to his brain, doctors said. After two operations and more than six weeks of hospital care, the Prince George's County boy died.

Deamonte's death and the ultimate cost of his care, which could total more than $250,000, underscore an often-overlooked concern in the debate over universal health coverage: dental care.

I did a quick run of claims for HealthFam members and came up with some… less than surprising results.

Excuses are constantly made for individuals on welfare programs. According to the Left around the world these are the downtrodden of our populace. They are the poor and disenfranchised kept down by “The Man.” Kept down by corporate America and any other reason the socialist Left can conjure. They blame anything and everything while ignoring personal responsibility.

I ran a quick Excel spreadsheet comparing the claims we have on file with group members and HealthFam members. Group members are children whose parents are employed and get their dental insurance through their employer. For the HealthFam children there are far more claims for root canals, fillings, crowns and other work that are caused by a lack of dental hygiene/care associated with the welfare members’ children than the group members.

The same sense of responsibility that urges successful people to graduate high school, hold a steady job (or several) to pay their way through college, graduate from college and be successful is the same sense of responsibility required to ensure your child upkeeps proper hygiene, dental or otherwise.

I know many of you bleeding hearts out there will say that toothbrushes, toothpaste and dental floss are oh so expensive but, can’t some of these poor downtrodden give up a little something for a toothbrush for their children? Or maybe it’s the governments or public schools responsibility to ensure our nations children are practicing proper oral hygiene?

I believe that the neglect for their children by not ensuring proper hygiene should be reported by the dental offices to the state for criminal child neglect.

“If his mother hadn't been focused on getting a dentist for his brother, who had six rotted teeth.”

I believe that with sufficient investigation Deamonte Driver’s mother could be charged with the death of her child due to criminal child neglect. Another example of the lack of personal responsibility on behalf of the welfare families.

The hard questions:

Why, when you drive through a welfare state trailer park is there trash everywhere? Why does the norm consist of unkempt lawns and dirty kids running around? Why is there white trash sitting on the front porch swatting flies? Why do most meth heads live in dirty trailer parks? Why are the crime rates higher? Why are most of the stores in areas such as that dirty and run down? Why do most people on welfare live in those sorts of areas? Why, are there ghettos in the city in which, a law enforcement officer won’t drive at night because they literally fear for their lives due to sniper fire? Why are drugs and prostitution rampant in those sorts of areas? Why is their graffiti everywhere? Why are the crime rates higher? Why do I see people littering on the side of the road in those areas? Why when the projects went up behind my apartments are there police helicopters hovering overhead at least once a month or so? Why do I always hear gansta rap bass coming from the vehicles in that apartment area? Why when I take a week off of work I look back there and see unemployed men standing around in the parking lot drinking their forties and cussing loudly? What causes these to be “bad” sections of town?

Why, when you drive through a middle-upper class neighborhood or apartment complex do you see the home owners out in their yards mowing and tending their gardens? Why is there little or no trash and graffiti? Why don’t you frequently hear gansta rap bass and see police helicopters circling overhead?

Why aren’t their kids dead due to criminal neglect the lack of simple dental hygiene?

Sometimes you may see a helicopter overhead a middle-upper class neighborhood or apartment complex but, it is because the police are chasing a deadbeat burglar or car rim thief who happens to have come from the ghetto or the trailer park down the road.

In the words of a liberal journalist:

“Deamonte's death and the ultimate cost of his care, which could total more than $250,000, underscore an often-overlooked concern in the debate over universal health coverage: dental care.”

In the words of a critical thinking American:

Deamonte's death and the ultimate cost of his care, which could total more than $250,000 could have all been avoided if his mother had ensured he practiced proper dental hygiene. Those who would overlook this are enablers and are just as guilty.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234567Next »